Within this article, we have come to the conclusion that the crime manner and its implementation method have rather similar contents, but in different cases: the crime manner concerns the legislator; the crime implementation method is about the offender. The crime manner is handmade by the legislator (in the normative manner cases) or, at least arises from his work (in the deed manner cases). The crime implementation method is the creation of the offender. So, the crime manner is strongly connected with the legislator’s volition; the crime implementation method depends on the realities exterior to the norm of incrimination. The crime constitution, which assumes the engagement of a deed as a whole of the penal norms, is the convergence point, is the point of interrelationship between the crime manner and the implementation crime method.