Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
752 4 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2022-01-04 14:07 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
[008+351.853:902/904](498) (1) |
Civilizație. Cultură. Progres (820) |
Activități specifice administrației publice (1080) |
Arheologie (937) |
Preistorie. Vestigii preistorice, artefacte, antichități (2097) |
Vestigii culturale ale diferitelor perioade istorice (3383) |
SM ISO690:2012 BÂRCĂ, Vitalie. Câteva observații privind administrarea cetăților dacice din Munții Orăștiei înscrise în Listapatrimoniului mondial UNESCO. In: Plural. History, Culture, Society, 2018, nr. 2, pp. 78-111. ISSN 2345-1262. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Plural. History, Culture, Society | ||||||
Numărul 2 / 2018 / ISSN 2345-1262 /ISSNe 2345-184X | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: [008+351.853:902/904](498) | ||||||
Pag. 78-111 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
In 1990, Romania signed the Convention concerning the protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, adopted by UNESCO in 1972. Nevertheless, the effective enforcement of the Convention occurred only in 2000, when the government approved measures for the protection of the historical monuments on the World Heritage List. After 2000, various laws on the management, preservation and protection of the monuments on the World Heritage List were issued. Some of the provisions of these laws have not been applied or complied with, which made that some of the Dacian fortresses lacked to have a legal administrator, further resulting in the monuments decay. Presently, there are no management plans for six Dacian fortresses. In addition to this lack of management plans there is the lack of managers for these monuments, but also the lack of management plans and minimal short-term strategies that would solve stringent issues. Another issue is that the Romanian authorities failed to resolve problems related to the permanent security of the monuments. The only Dacian fortress from the Orăștiei Mountains to benefit from 24/24-security services is Sarmizegetusa Regia, which is under the administration of the District Council of Hunedoara. Therefore, the phenomenon of the archaeological poaching and deliberate destruction disappeared completely in the area of Sarmizegetusa Regia. Not the same applies for the remaining fortresses, where the destruction, vandalism and archaeological poaching may be still found and not rarely. In almost all these fortresses, there are buildings in ruin and walls dislodges on several parts. Access routes to some of these Dacian fortresses are inadequate and vegetation in these unmanaged sites has invaded the monuments. The poor state of these fortresses is due to the fact they are managed by no one. Also, the legal status of the land on which the mentioned monuments lay and its registration has not been clarified until now alongside with the land mapping, the establishment of competent agents to manage UNESCO remains; the inclusion of the monuments and protection areas in the PUZ (Regional Urban Plan) and PUG (General Urban Plan) type documentations of the administrative-territorial units within the range of which lie respective monuments and documentation for the draft of large scale feasibility studies for each fortress were not prepared and drafted. At Sarmizegetusa Regia things have changed for the better in the last 5 years, while discrepancies between this site and those unmanaged are increasingly more visible. There were set up: the Administration of the historical monument of Sarmizegetusa Regia, constant security/surveillance, video surveillance; a Consulting Scientific Council was created and a regulation for visiting the site was drafted and enforced. There were established visiting routes and created explanatory panels with texts in Romanian and English for each monument, while in the pavilion from the access to the site may be purchased adequate informative materials. The access road to Sarmizegetusa Regia was upgraded. The County Council of Hunedoara also finances archaeological excavations. Past all these positive things, there is a series of aspects that still require remedy. Amongst, the dislodgement of the constructional block and elements on certain parts of the fortification walls, the issue of the trees that fall onto the monument and the lack of management plans. The poor state in which lay part of these universal interest monuments reveals that the Romanian state, through the Ministry of Culture and National Identity, whose purpose, among others, is to protect the cultural heritage, shows nothing but contempt and total disinterest for these fortresses. The inactivity and lack of action of the state central authorities, added by opposition in transferring the management of the fortresses left in ruin to other institutions are revolting and prove the lack of vision, responsibility and respect for these unique monuments that belong to the universal heritage |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie heritage, monuments, UNESCO, Dacian fortresses, Orăștiei Mountains, Bănița, Costești-Blidaru, Costești-Cetățuie, Piatra Roșie, Sarmizegetusa Regia, Căpâlna., UNESCO, Bănița, Costești-Blidaru, Costești-Cetățuie, Piatra Roșie, Sarmizegetusa Regia, Căpâlna., patrimoniu, monumente, cetățile dacice, Munții Orăștiei |
||||||
|