Evaluating progestogens for prevention of preterm birth international collaborative (EPPPIC) individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: protocol
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
799 7
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2023-02-28 12:47
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
615.256.5:618.3-085.2/.3 (1)
Medicamentele potrivit acţiunii lor principale (395)
SM ISO690:2012
STEWART, Lesley A., SIMMONDS, Mark, DULEY, Lelia, DIETZ, Kristina Charlotte, HARDEN, Melissa, HODKINSON, Alex, LLEWELLYN, Alexis, SHARIF, Sahar, WALKER, Ruth, WRIGHT, Kath. Evaluating progestogens for prevention of preterm birth international collaborative (EPPPIC) individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: protocol. In: Buletin de Perinatologie, 2017, nr. 4(76), pp. 61-76. ISSN 1810-5289.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Buletin de Perinatologie
Numărul 4(76) / 2017 / ISSN 1810-5289

Evaluating progestogens for prevention of preterm birth international collaborative (EPPPIC) individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: protocol

CZU: 615.256.5:618.3-085.2/.3

Pag. 61-76

Stewart Lesley A.1, Simmonds Mark1, Duley Lelia2, Dietz Kristina Charlotte1, Harden Melissa1, Hodkinson Alex1, Llewellyn Alexis1, Sharif Sahar1, Walker Ruth1, Wright Kath1
 
1 University of York,
2 University of Nottingham
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 17 februarie 2018


Rezumat

Background: Preterm birth is the most common cause of death and harm to newborn babies. Babies that are born early may have difficulties at birth and experience health problems during early childhood. Despite extensive study, there is still uncertainty about the effectiveness of progestogen (medications that are similar to the natural hormone progesterone) in preventing or delaying preterm birth, and in improving birth outcomes. The Evaluating Progestogen for Prevention of Preterm birth International Collaborative (EPPPIC) project aims to reduce uncertainty about the specific conditions in which progestogen may (or may not) be effective in preventing or delaying preterm birth and improving birth outcomes. Methods: The design of the study involves international collaborative individual participant data meta-analysis comprising systematic review, re-analysis, and synthesis of trial datasets. Inclusion criteria are as follows: randomized controlled trials comparing progestogen versus placebo or nonintervention, or comparing different types of progestogen, in asymptomatic women at risk of preterm birth. Main outcomes are as follows; fetal/infant death, preterm birth or fetal death (<=37 weeks, <=34 weeks, <= 28 weeks), serious neonatal complications or fetal/infant death, neurosensory disability (measured at 18 months or later) or infant/child death, important maternal morbidity, or maternal death. In statistical methods, IPD will be synthesized across trials using meta-analysis. Both ‘two-stage’ models (where effect estimates are calculated for each trial and subsequently pooled in a meta-analysis) and ‘one-stage’ models (where all IPD from all trials are analyzed in one step, while accounting for the clustering of participants within trials) will be used. If sufficient suitable data are available, a network meta-analysis will compare all types of progesterone and routes of administration extending the one-stage models to include multiple treatment arms. Discussion: EPPPIC is an international collaborative project being conducted by the forming EPPPIC group, which includes trial investigators, an international secretariat, and the research project team. Results, which are intended to contribute to improvements in maternal and child health, are expected to be publicly available in mid 2018.

Cuvinte-cheie
preterm birth,

Progestogen, Individual participant data, IPD, Meta-analysis.