Morpho-anatomical peculiarities of generative organs of intergeneric hybrids Cydonia x Malus
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
744 2
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2021-01-02 19:54
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
581.4:582.998:634.1 (1)
Morfologia plantelor. Anatomia plantelor (115)
Botanică sistematică (866)
Cultura fructelor (1446)
SM ISO690:2012
ONIKA, Elisaveta. Morpho-anatomical peculiarities of generative organs of intergeneric hybrids Cydonia x Malus. In: Revista Botanică, 2015, nr. 2(11), pp. 31-34. ISSN 1857-2367.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Revista Botanică
Numărul 2(11) / 2015 / ISSN 1857-2367 /ISSNe 2587-3814

Morpho-anatomical peculiarities of generative organs of intergeneric hybrids Cydonia x Malus
CZU: 581.4:582.998:634.1

Pag. 31-34

Onika Elisaveta
 
Botanical Garden (Institute) of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 26 februarie 2016


Rezumat

This article describes the peculiarities of morphological and anatomical structure of generative organs of intergeneric hybrids Cydonia x Malus. Distant hybrids differ in the number of flowers in an inflorescence: 1-4, but solitary flowers predominate in 5065% of paternal triploids. Solitary flowers predominate in 97-99% of maternal triploids and tetraploids and 1-3% of them have inflorescences with 2 flowers. Solitary flowers predominate in 75% of diploids and 25% have inflorescences with 2 flowers. It has been established a directly proportional correlation between the polyploidy level and the size of the pollen grain. Tetraploid plants are distinguished by higher pollen viability (56-67%) as compared with other hybrids, the viability of the pollen of which reaches 10%. The similarities and differences of characters in the structure of the pericarp of hybrids Cydonia x Malus are highlighted. The studied hybrids differ qualitatively (in the uneven thickening of the cell walls of epidermal cells, in the location and density of sclereids in the subzones of the mesocarp, in the shape of the exocarp and endocarp) and quantitatively, in the size of cells from the zones and subzones of the pericarp.