Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
271 4 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-03-24 15:47 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
82:1 (19) |
Literatură (3560) |
FILOSOFIE. PSIHOLOGIE (4722) |
SM ISO690:2012 AFLOROAEI, Ştefan. „Amo, ergo sum”. Un răspuns de inspirație patristică la celebra sentință carteziană. In: Limba Română , 2022, nr. 1-2(267-268), pp. 77-83. ISSN 0235-9111. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Limba Română | ||||||
Numărul 1-2(267-268) / 2022 / ISSN 0235-9111 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 82:1 | ||||||
Pag. 77-83 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
At the beginning of a section in Orthodox dogmatic theology studies, Dumitru Stăniloae invokes a well known Cartesian sentence: „cogito, ergo sum”. After several considerations, he reminds us of the saying of Patriarch Callistus of Constantinople, from the 15th century: „amo, ergo sum”. He further argues that both statements, even though they are under quite different intentionalities, reveal to us man as a person, as a being in communion with the others. Thus, as he points out in another context, it would be more appropriate to say: „I am, therefore we are”. I do not think that it is easy to come across such an interpretative approach in regard that Cartesian statement, just as unexpected at first site and as comprehensive and elevated. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie Descartes („cogito, ergo sum”), Patriarch Callistus („amo; ergo sum”), Dumitru Stăniloae („I am, therefore we are”) |
||||||
|