Knowing that the penal treatment and the multiple incoherence in the jurisprudence toward the corruption infringements is welcome we will put in evidence certain experiences in the application of the judicial precedent in these cases, relating to the Great Britain’s legislation. The number of incriminated trespasses as corruption infringements in the English legislation is reduced. To them are referred those penal trespasses, whose sanction are conditioned by the serious encroaching upon the duties of the job’s position. The English law is granting a special importance to this criminal phenomenon having in the point of view the large interpretation of the notion of corruption (bribery) that is contained in the base laws that establish the responsibility for this kind of acts and in English common law (based on precedents). Concomitant with the common law, corruption (bribery) is still stipulated in other 3 laws: the Law on corruption (bribery) in the public organizations of 1889; Law on the forewarning of corruption of 1906; the Law on the forewarning of corruption of 1916. The responsibility for the corruption during the parliament’s elections or just during the local elections is established distinctly through the Law reporting to the popular performance from 1983. Although similar laws are periodical promulgated after 2-3 years the general notion of the corruption of the public civil servants remains that was formulated in the common English law, through precedents of 1809 and 1914.