Condition in which the territory between Nistru and Prut resulted a disagreement during a long time through the history, between great empires neighboring, soldiers with numerous army confrontations, writings about its history (only few of them refers directly to the archeology ) were signed by political confrontations, which were characterized by a very strong dominated subjectivism , that distorted history reality in a programmatic way. Concept Moldovenism opposite Romanism, was designed and developed by Soviet historiography still from the early ‘20s of XX century, in the context of non-recognition by the Bolshevik regime of union of Bessarabia and Romania and creation MASSR obvious expansionist purposes. Quintessence of all the work constituted a theory about the formation of the medieval era in Southeast Europe, two distinct peoples: the Romanians and Moldovans,, “and,, illegal occupation of Bessarabia in 1918 by Romania bourgeois-landlord”. In this context, it is compulsory to overcome false dogmas and precepts that dominated Soviet historiography in the writing of history until the fall of the communist regime. and the persistent unfortunately among some historians and consciousness of the population of the republic.