Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
858 3 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2017-04-25 22:53 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
004.91 (39) |
Informatică aplicată. Tehnici bazate pe calculator cu aplicații practice (442) |
SM ISO690:2012 CRISTEA, Dan. Natural Language Processing versus Logic. Pros and cons on the dispute whether logic is useful in the computational interpretation of language. In: Computer Science Journal of Moldova, 2016, nr. 3(72), pp. 399-416. ISSN 1561-4042. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Computer Science Journal of Moldova | |||||||
Numărul 3(72) / 2016 / ISSN 1561-4042 /ISSNe 2587-4330 | |||||||
|
|||||||
CZU: 004.91 | |||||||
Pag. 399-416 | |||||||
|
|||||||
Descarcă PDF | |||||||
Rezumat | |||||||
In this essay I express some personal opinions regarding the influence that logic has on modern approaches to process natural language in artificial systems. I start by presenting some successful linguistic formalisms that were originated in logic, arguing why logic is important in conveying the meaning of language expression. Then, I counterbalance the argumentation with a number of examples where logic is impuissant to mirror language usage, finally supporting a rather temperate opinion about the usefulness of logic to formalise low level linguistic processes and about the limits of language formalisation. |
|||||||
Cuvinte-cheie natural language processing (NLP), logic theories in NLP, statistical approaches, symbolic versus statistical approaches in NLP |
|||||||
|