Natural Language Processing versus Logic. Pros and cons on the dispute whether logic is useful in the computational interpretation of language
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
858 3
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2017-04-25 22:53
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
004.91 (39)
Informatică aplicată. Tehnici bazate pe calculator cu aplicații practice (442)
SM ISO690:2012
CRISTEA, Dan. Natural Language Processing versus Logic. Pros and cons on the dispute whether logic is useful in the computational interpretation of language. In: Computer Science Journal of Moldova, 2016, nr. 3(72), pp. 399-416. ISSN 1561-4042.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Computer Science Journal of Moldova
Numărul 3(72) / 2016 / ISSN 1561-4042 /ISSNe 2587-4330

Natural Language Processing versus Logic. Pros and cons on the dispute whether logic is useful in the computational interpretation of language
CZU: 004.91

Pag. 399-416

Cristea Dan
 
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi
 
Proiecte:
 
Disponibil în IBN: 6 decembrie 2016


Rezumat

In this essay I express some personal opinions regarding the influence that logic has on modern approaches to process natural language in artificial systems. I start by presenting some successful linguistic formalisms that were originated in logic, arguing why logic is important in conveying the meaning of language expression. Then, I counterbalance the argumentation with a number of examples where logic is impuissant to mirror language usage, finally supporting a rather temperate opinion about the usefulness of logic to formalise low level linguistic processes and about the limits of language formalisation.

Cuvinte-cheie
natural language processing (NLP),

logic theories in NLP, statistical approaches, symbolic versus statistical approaches in NLP