In the present article we intend to carry out a synthesis of judicial practice on the basis of documentary material accumulated in connection with the functional obligations as to the judicial appeal. Pursuing the aim of launching a practical and scientific discussion, I invite to read and analyze some conflict problems, according to the aspectual approach of general importance problems for jurisprudence, concerning the fundamental vice in the framework of the procedure of appeal or recourse, which, from our point of view, have affected our opinion in making the decision. According to this idea we think it useful to render the texts of motivated conclusions, mainly approaching the situation in which I have manifested a different point of view on the adopted solution, especially when at the pronounced decision we have expressed a different point of view. Consequently, I launch the idea that the approached modality, as to the synthesis of the proper motivated solutions, to represent the first step towards a wider practical-scientific application – a collection of causes, that should embrace the forms of manifestation of the judicial act and the effects of judicial error in the case when there is fundamental vice in the framework of the preceding procedure, which had affected the pronounced decision.