Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
995 13 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-05-06 14:42 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
930.1(478) (6) |
Istoria ca știință (55) |
SM ISO690:2012 ENCIU, Nicolae. Ştiinţa istorică academică din Republica Moldova: starea actuală şi perspectivele studiilor de istorie contemporană. In: Revista de Istorie a Moldovei, 2011, nr. 3-4(88), pp. 187-228. ISSN 1857-2022. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Revista de Istorie a Moldovei | ||||||
Numărul 3-4(88) / 2011 / ISSN 1857-2022 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 930.1(478) | ||||||
Pag. 187-228 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
Along with the transition to a modern and democratic political organization, based on values and norms of liberal democracy of the countries from European area of culture and civilization, the years that followed the proclamation of the Republic of Moldova’s sovereignity and independence were marked by efforts to restore the social functions of history, as a fundamental element collective
memory and spiritual culture of society as a whole. Considering such attempt of a great theoretical and scientific benefit, and
also of a real applied value, and without claiming an exhaustive or unique approach of the problem, this historiographical study is aimed to provide an overall analysis of the evolution of the academic research in contemporary historiography, in one hand, and to offer a critical assessment of the current state of research
in this field, on the other hand, - all of which will help identifying perspective and priority directions of the contemporary history studies in the Republic of Moldova, so that the contemporary history research was able to resist the many and various pressures brought by globalization: political and ideological pressures, of
the continuously changing and adapting educational system, of economic and financial constraints, conflicting theories on the twentieth century and also, especially in contemporary history’s case, the pressure of public opinion. |
||||||
|