Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
1542 3 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2021-10-24 18:54 |
SM ISO690:2012 BIDENKO, Iulia. Западное постсоветское пограничье: Концептуальные определения, траектории интеграции и полюса притяжения. In: Revista Moldovenească de Drept Internaţional şi Relaţii Internaţionale, 2012, nr. 2, pp. 33-47. ISSN 1857-1999. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Revista Moldovenească de Drept Internaţional şi Relaţii Internaţionale | ||||||
Numărul 2 / 2012 / ISSN 1857-1999 /ISSNe 2345-1963 | ||||||
|
||||||
Pag. 33-47 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The trends of globalization significantly impact on the sovereignty of modern states, increase influence of the foreign policy on societies. This thesis is particularly relevant to the Western Post-Soviet countries such as Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova which were traditionally considered as a civilizational border between Europe and Eurasia and which has not yet been unambiguously defined their geopolitical strategy. As to author position they could be considered not as a common region, but as a space, influenced by a homogeneous international system - the European Union, which attracts them to social standards, freedom of movement and work places, the rule of law and democracy. Russia and its partners (heterogeneous international system) are attractive by natural resources, shared values, religion, and a stable regime can ensure energy security in exchange for loyalty and submission.
These states are involved in the Eastern Partnership EU Program, but domestic elites do not make crucial steps to integrate into one or another international system. Citizens of countries, which public opinion is analysed in this article, cannot be stable with their geo-political preferences – they depend on the conditions of domestic politics and internal conditions in Russia and the European Union circumstances. Thus author comes to conclusion that these states will balance between the attractive social guarantees and transparency of the democratic regimes of the European Union, and resource and cultural heritage of Eurasia. Therefore, the author considers this region as unstable and unable to join any of the poles of a heterogeneous international system over the next decades. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie западное постсоветское пограничье, гетерогенная международная система., Восточное партнерство |
||||||
|